All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by

Conference Realignment Board

daveinop

Joined: 04/10/2003 Posts: 8165
Likes: 518


Read it again. to make the profit now, they have to sell. to get


get the big windfall, they have to hold, which leaves them with a potential revenue gap for 8 more years.

they are behind revenue-wise and Scott says that's okay with his constituents. if they keep him, we'll know he was right.

if the ACC announces it is going to stay significantly behind the SEC/B1G in order to capitalize in 2025, you will explode. and you have been consistently critical of the ACC taking a wait and see approach up to now..."we should already have something in place"

here are the key quotes...

"Scott is aware of the fan (and campus) frustrations with Pac12Nets distribution and revenue. But whether you agree or not, his priority is the long haul – and the presidents and chancellors support that approach.

Scott believes the windfall worth waiting for, even if it means the Pac12Nets distributions lags those of the B1G and SEC networks by $50 million (or more) annually.

*** What does the long haul mean?

It could mean up to eight more years. The current Tier 1 deal with ESPN and FOX expires in the summer of 2024. When that happens, the conference will take everything it owns to the market.

"In Scott’s view, the confluence of rising demand for live sports (good insight here) … and changes in media landscape … and demand for Pac-12 content … will work to create a bonanza for the conference at the negotiating table with fill-in-the-blank (ESPN, FOX, Hulu, Facebook, Google, etc).

“We want to create the most long-term value,” he said. “That’s the mission.”


and


"We don’t know if the conference would sell 49 or 51 percent ownership, so let’s just assume an equity sale would produce half the total valuation, or $400 million.

That’s $33 million per school.

And that’s a whopping figure, except when you compare it to the cost of staying the course.

Staying the course means a per-school deficit of at least $5 million annually, over the next eight years, when compared to the per-school distributions provided by the SEC and Big Ten networks."

Then again, we don’t know the valuation growth rate of the Pac12Nets, and the potential premium on the open market due to multiple bids."

(In response to this post by chuckd4vt)

Posted: 06/17/2016 at 08:03AM



+0

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
 
  
Larry Scott: "PAC-12N Optimal Model for US" -- HOO86 06/16/2016 5:06PM
  Adding 4 Big 12 schools would improve distribution.. -- Old Line Hokie 06/17/2016 11:15AM
  I think the PAC12 has a luxury that the ACC doesn't have... -- Mr. Touchdown 06/17/2016 10:46AM
  I see it very differently... -- jesuisvtguy 06/18/2016 05:00AM
  Love that model. It's ALREADY worth $800 million. -- chuckd4vt 06/16/2016 10:04PM
  Rinse, repeat** -- daveinop 06/17/2016 5:14PM
  Larry Scott claims that his way is better. -- HOO86 06/16/2016 8:16PM

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors

vm307